Skip to main content

Canyon Spectral AL 6.0


Round two, and the 6.0 leaps out of the blocks. From the moment we're off the smaller wheeled Spectral wants to go flat out. Standing on the pedals on the small steep climbs is slightly more reactive, surging the Spectral forward that little more eagerly. We need more body language to get the wheels over the roots, but again the 2.4in Mountain King's tread impresses.

The Spectral 6.0 comes with 140mm of travel at each end, 10mm more than the 29er version. We hit a steep, loose and rocky climb, one the local DHers push up. While the 29er Spectral covered the ground with little worry, we have to play with fore and aft weighting a bit smarter here to maintain traction, and the longer travel feels a touch more wallowy, at least in Descend mode.

Guiding light
Canyon's E168 chainguide features on both bikes - a nylon runner hung under the chainstay prevents the chain slapping around too much, equally controlled by the Shimano XT Shadow + rear mech. On the climbs you can feel the chain running over the runner, but on descents that chain is kept nicely in check. With a double ring setup not benefitting from narrow/wide rings it's an extra bit of security.

When we hit the irst descent with its table tops we don't pick up speed quite so fast, but we're easily airborne and the bike's playful nature comes out. Flicking the back wheel out mid air is easier than on the 29er and there's plenty of pop off the lip. It's not long until we hit the roots once again. While the 29er Spectral battered through them, the 650 model is happiest hopping over them. All out speed is similar, but they handle it differently.

Subtle size differences
The two bikes feel reasonably similar in size. In Medium the effective toptube is 1mm longer in the 650 version, but this jumps to an 8mm difference in size L. That extra length should give more stability at higher speeds. The shorter 430mm chainstays in the AL 6.0 mean the back end is more lickable and eager to turn, adding to that playfulness.

At 140mm the Fox 32 is pushed to its limits of stiffness; there's noticeable twang when hitting corners at full pelt. Damping from the Evolution damper is good, but not quite as plush and supportive as the Performance unit found on the Al 7.9. Thankfully Canyon has specced a stiffer, if heavier, DT Swiss M1900 wheelset than the more XC-focused M1700 set fitted to the 29er.

Once we hit the tight, twisty descent on the 650b Spectral it's back to business with cornering. We don't need to ride the front of the bike so much, and like the Scott Scale, it's just a case of dropping our shoulder for instantaneous direction changes. With the trail snaking below us it's an easy job of placing the bike just where we want it in corner.

Both cockpits feature Iridium bars and stems - 740mm and 60mm respectively. They're nicely shaped and for trail bikes the bar is wide enough. That can't be said of the Ergon GE1 grips, which bulge and taper along their length. It's a personal thing, but we prefer regular shaped grips.

One of the most fun trail bikes out thereforthemoney, beefiertyres wouldboostitstrail tamingpotential.

FRAME Canyon Spectral AL
FORK Fox 32 Float CTD Evolution, 140mm
SHOCK Fox Float CTD Performance
WHEELS DT Swiss M1900 Spline
TYRES Continental Mountain King II Protection 29x2.4in (F & R)
CRANKS Shimano SLX, 36/24
GEARS Shimano SLX shifters, SLX mech (F), XT Shadow + mech (R)
BRAKES Shimano SLX, 180/160mm rotors
SEATPOST RockShox Reverb Stealth
HANDLEBAR, STEM, SADDLE Iridium 3-0 Trail
GRIPS Ergon GE1
SIZES XS, S, M (tested), L, XL
WEIGHT 13.6kg (29.9lb)

PRICE 2550$

Popular posts from this blog

KONA SHRED

With a reputation for no-nonsense ruggedness and a background in the always progressive and punishing riding of Canada, Kona have been building hardcore hardtails for longer than almost anyone else. The Shred is the most expensive bike on test but it’s a proper trail tank.

Nukeproof Vector AM Comp Cro-Mo saddle

The Vector AM is pretty race focused, with minimal padding. There’s a deep (if narrow) pressurerelief channel to keep the blood flowing where it’s meant to. Used with bib shorts, we found it pretty comfortable for shorter rides and suffered no pain or discomfort in the central region. On steep climbs the slightly downturned nose provides a reasonable forward perch, while the svelte profile and smooth edges make it particularly unobtrusive when moving about on the descents. It’s quite stiff though, and can feel harsh on long rides or bumpy ground. We definitely wouldn’t want to spend much time on it without a chamois. It’s heavier than we’d expect for such a lightly padded perch too. There’s a lighter Pro version with titanium rails for $105, but at 241g it’s only 10g lighter. Weight 251g Price $67

GT Zaskar Evolution

While some bike models last just a couple of years, others change with the times to stay at the top of riders’ wishlists. In the second part of this series looking at the evolution of bikes that enjoy enduring popularity with UK riders, we turn to the GT Zaskar – a bike that was at the forefront of our sport for a long time and still has plenty of appeal today.

Cannondale Trail SL 29 SS

The fat aluminium tubes are a constrast to the skinny items seen elsewhere in the test, but this rigid Cannondale uses them to create one of the most old-school - and lightest - rides here.

Merida Big Seven 100

We've rolled up to our local woods, with a meandering blue trail, some natural wooded tracks and a bit of fire road chucked into the mix to see how the Big Seven 100 tackles trails that entry-level riders are likely to cut their teeth on.