Skip to main content

RockShox RS1 Fork Long Term Review


With its ‘upside down’ layout, full-carbon upper legs and exposed stanchions, the RS1 has raised a lot of questions about its longevity. We’ve had this RS1 in action for almost 10 months now, so let's take a look back at how it has fared.

First up a quick recap… It retails for $2,300 and you also need to buy the matching proprietary hub, so it’s crazyexpensive. Still, I’ve seen a number of riders using them and they come as standard spec on some $6,000 hardtails.

The design places the largest part of the structure up near the crown; right where the leverage is greatest. Instead of using a brace, the massive 27mm diameter axle of the Predictive Steering hub serves to tie the lower legs together.

Initially we mounted the fork to a carbon hardtail, replacing a RockShox Reba. The swap straight-out transformed the ride. It felt more controlled and didn’t twang back and forth when braking into rough corners. We were pretty stoked with the performance and while it’s around 130g heavier than a SID World Cup XC fork, the added control was appreciated whenever the trail turned rough.

The RS1 can be set to offer 80, 100 or 120mm of travel, so next we tested it on a 120mm trail bike. The fore-aft stiffness remained a highlight; it’s clearly more stable when braking and it doesn’t feel like it wants to fold back underneath you.

When compared to a good 120mm travel trail fork, the RS1 seems to suffer a bit more stiction. One of the supposed benefits with an upside down design is the permanently lubricated seals. However, if you push down on the bars and gradually increase load, the fork resists movement until you reach a certain point, then it suddenly falls into its travel. I tried a few other RS1s and they shared the same trait. An oil bath and air piston service did improve things but still wasn’t the most supple in this regard.

While this stiction would generally be seen as a negative, it actually seemed to serve a purpose on the RS1. It is pitched squarely at the XC racer and this initial resistance helps to stabilise the fork when you’re out of the saddle and cranking – like a simplistic form of platform damping.

RockShox uses their ‘token’ spacer system to tune the air volume within the fork. The stock setup uses two spacers and this worked well in the 100mm travel mode. Once we bumped it up to 120mm, we felt that an extra token was required to make it softer initially whilst still offering enough bottom out resistance. Overall we’d say that the RS1 air spring felt more natural in 100mm format.

BIG HIT BABY
With a little bit of stiction, you would expect the bump-eating performance to be compromised. While I’m sure it’d eat the bumps even better if it wasn’t sticky, the upside down design offers a clear improvement when you’re pushing the bike hard and taking mid-to-large sized hits. A traditional fork may feel smoother in the car park, but they tend to bind when the fork is loaded up. Much of this comes from flex in the skinnier upper legs; when they bend the bushings no longer slide freely. With its short inner legs and massive upper assembly, the fork is better able to move whilst you charge headlong into the bumps. It mightn’t be as pillowy as a dedicated trail fork but it offers excellent control for what it is – a super-light fork that pairs well with shorter travel XC bikes.

As for the fears of stanchion damage; our fork copped its share of knocks on the dropouts but we only noticed one little nick on the lower slider of the fork – it was the sort of scratch that would buff out with some fine wet and dry. Perhaps we were lucky but we certainly didn’t treat the fork with kid gloves. If you did damage an RS1 lower, they can be replaced individually for $159 – by comparison a regular crown and steerer assembly is a little over $500.

PRICE 2300$








Popular posts from this blog

KONA SHRED

With a reputation for no-nonsense ruggedness and a background in the always progressive and punishing riding of Canada, Kona have been building hardcore hardtails for longer than almost anyone else. The Shred is the most expensive bike on test but it’s a proper trail tank.

ENVE M50 29" Wheels

Utah based company ENVE have been making drool-worthy carbon components for some years now. Despite the fact that carbon rims are becoming more and more common on mountain bikes these days, you can guarantee that ENVE wheels will be a talking point when someone is eyeing off a steed. Instantly, the big bold logos on each rim scream "fast", "light" and to some extent, "expensive" The kids call this 'bling'.

Cannondale Trail SL 29 SS

The fat aluminium tubes are a constrast to the skinny items seen elsewhere in the test, but this rigid Cannondale uses them to create one of the most old-school - and lightest - rides here.

NS Bikes Metropolis bike

There aren’t many companies like NS Bikes, whose entire product range is designed around getting rad, ripping corners and boosting jumps. The Polish brand are passionate about freeride and have gained a reputation for building heavy-hitting,wellspecced and reasonably-priced bikes. This latest incarnation of their Metropolis dirt jump rig follows in this vein, with a doublebutted 4130 chromoly frame and an array of reliable kit. The frame mixes MTB and BMXtechnology, using a threaded bottom bracket and Race Face AEfect two-piece crankset in combination with horizontal dropouts and an integrated headset and seat clamp. A Manitou Circus Elite fork gives 100mm of air-sprung travel, with a 20mm front axle to maintain stifness. The Metropolis rolls on 26in NS Fundamental rims, fitted with Kenda Small Block 8 tyres. We reckon the combo of chrome frame and tan-wall rubber looks pretty rad too! The full build weighs a fairly robust 12.13kg , but it should have no problem shrugging of s...

YT Tues downhill bike

The new Tues downhill bike is here – and won a World Cup on its first outing While a number of big brands have launched 29er downhill bikes,YT Industries are sticking with proven 650b wheels – for now, at least. The latest Tues comes in five sizes (S-XXL), with the biggest sporting a reach of 495mm. Head tube and chainstay lengths now vary between sizes, to put the rider in a better position on the bike. The S-L bikes have 435mm stays, while the XL and XXL are a shade longer, at 440mm. Reach is longer than last year on some sizes, including the XL ridden to victory by Aaron Gwin at this year’s openingWorld Cup round.A reachadjust headset can be used to tailor the fit further. YT have also made subtle but significant changes to the suspension. The initial stroke is said to be more sensitive, while there’s more mid-stroke support, to sit the bottom bracket a shade higher when on track.YT have decreased end-stroke progression, by five per cent, to make tackling really big hits th...