Skip to main content

RockShox RS1 Fork Long Term Review


With its ‘upside down’ layout, full-carbon upper legs and exposed stanchions, the RS1 has raised a lot of questions about its longevity. We’ve had this RS1 in action for almost 10 months now, so let's take a look back at how it has fared.

First up a quick recap… It retails for $2,300 and you also need to buy the matching proprietary hub, so it’s crazyexpensive. Still, I’ve seen a number of riders using them and they come as standard spec on some $6,000 hardtails.

The design places the largest part of the structure up near the crown; right where the leverage is greatest. Instead of using a brace, the massive 27mm diameter axle of the Predictive Steering hub serves to tie the lower legs together.

Initially we mounted the fork to a carbon hardtail, replacing a RockShox Reba. The swap straight-out transformed the ride. It felt more controlled and didn’t twang back and forth when braking into rough corners. We were pretty stoked with the performance and while it’s around 130g heavier than a SID World Cup XC fork, the added control was appreciated whenever the trail turned rough.

The RS1 can be set to offer 80, 100 or 120mm of travel, so next we tested it on a 120mm trail bike. The fore-aft stiffness remained a highlight; it’s clearly more stable when braking and it doesn’t feel like it wants to fold back underneath you.

When compared to a good 120mm travel trail fork, the RS1 seems to suffer a bit more stiction. One of the supposed benefits with an upside down design is the permanently lubricated seals. However, if you push down on the bars and gradually increase load, the fork resists movement until you reach a certain point, then it suddenly falls into its travel. I tried a few other RS1s and they shared the same trait. An oil bath and air piston service did improve things but still wasn’t the most supple in this regard.

While this stiction would generally be seen as a negative, it actually seemed to serve a purpose on the RS1. It is pitched squarely at the XC racer and this initial resistance helps to stabilise the fork when you’re out of the saddle and cranking – like a simplistic form of platform damping.

RockShox uses their ‘token’ spacer system to tune the air volume within the fork. The stock setup uses two spacers and this worked well in the 100mm travel mode. Once we bumped it up to 120mm, we felt that an extra token was required to make it softer initially whilst still offering enough bottom out resistance. Overall we’d say that the RS1 air spring felt more natural in 100mm format.

BIG HIT BABY
With a little bit of stiction, you would expect the bump-eating performance to be compromised. While I’m sure it’d eat the bumps even better if it wasn’t sticky, the upside down design offers a clear improvement when you’re pushing the bike hard and taking mid-to-large sized hits. A traditional fork may feel smoother in the car park, but they tend to bind when the fork is loaded up. Much of this comes from flex in the skinnier upper legs; when they bend the bushings no longer slide freely. With its short inner legs and massive upper assembly, the fork is better able to move whilst you charge headlong into the bumps. It mightn’t be as pillowy as a dedicated trail fork but it offers excellent control for what it is – a super-light fork that pairs well with shorter travel XC bikes.

As for the fears of stanchion damage; our fork copped its share of knocks on the dropouts but we only noticed one little nick on the lower slider of the fork – it was the sort of scratch that would buff out with some fine wet and dry. Perhaps we were lucky but we certainly didn’t treat the fork with kid gloves. If you did damage an RS1 lower, they can be replaced individually for $159 – by comparison a regular crown and steerer assembly is a little over $500.

PRICE 2300$








Popular posts from this blog

KONA SHRED

With a reputation for no-nonsense ruggedness and a background in the always progressive and punishing riding of Canada, Kona have been building hardcore hardtails for longer than almost anyone else. The Shred is the most expensive bike on test but it’s a proper trail tank.

Nukeproof Vector AM Comp Cro-Mo saddle

The Vector AM is pretty race focused, with minimal padding. There’s a deep (if narrow) pressurerelief channel to keep the blood flowing where it’s meant to. Used with bib shorts, we found it pretty comfortable for shorter rides and suffered no pain or discomfort in the central region. On steep climbs the slightly downturned nose provides a reasonable forward perch, while the svelte profile and smooth edges make it particularly unobtrusive when moving about on the descents. It’s quite stiff though, and can feel harsh on long rides or bumpy ground. We definitely wouldn’t want to spend much time on it without a chamois. It’s heavier than we’d expect for such a lightly padded perch too. There’s a lighter Pro version with titanium rails for $105, but at 241g it’s only 10g lighter. Weight 251g Price $67

GT Zaskar Evolution

While some bike models last just a couple of years, others change with the times to stay at the top of riders’ wishlists. In the second part of this series looking at the evolution of bikes that enjoy enduring popularity with UK riders, we turn to the GT Zaskar – a bike that was at the forefront of our sport for a long time and still has plenty of appeal today.

Cannondale Trail SL 29 SS

The fat aluminium tubes are a constrast to the skinny items seen elsewhere in the test, but this rigid Cannondale uses them to create one of the most old-school - and lightest - rides here.

CANYON NERVE AL 8.0

  S ince their entry into the UK market a few years ago, Canyon have made a name for themselves as purveyors of well-made bikes that exhibit often extraordinary value. The secret (or catch, depending on your point of view) is that the brand don’t have dealers – they ship bikes directly to your door.