Skip to main content

X-Fusion Microlite shock


As the name suggests, the Microlite shock is designed with weight reduction in mind. Our 184x44mm sample hit the scales at 195g saving around 50g when compared to a regular inline shock.

X-Fusion makes a wide range of suspension components and most are very adjustable. The Microlite however is a pared down and simple offering. The main air spring is tuneable (as you’d expect) and the rebound can be set to match the spring rate. There’s also a lockout lever but that’s about it. You won’t find any low speed compression adjustment or threshold settings – it’s either ‘on’ or ‘off’ and nothing in between.

Compared to the current generation Fox Float rear shock (a product that many will be familiar with), the Microlite has an inherently progressive spring curve. It starts out supple but ramps up to offer plenty of bottom-out resistance.

Of course your frame kinematics will always play an important role in how a shock feels. Most shorter travel XC bikes tend to have a linear or regressive leverage ratio. This makes them firmer in the early travel while still moving for mid-sized bumps but it doesn’t afford lots of bottom out resistance. The progressive nature of the Microlite is well suited to this type of bike; it adds suppleness over smaller bumps but doesn’t slam to the bottom or wallow excessively when pushed. Despite its diminutive size I had no issues with the shock on long and rough descents – it performed very well. However, if your suspension arrangement is progressive to begin with, you mightn’t use all of the available travel – even on the biggest hits. With the Microlite there aren’t any large volume air canister options; it simply isn’t as tuneable as a heavier, fully featured shock.

At $480 the Microlite is well priced for a high quality rear shock and its performance should provide a good match for most modern XC platforms. It’s worth considering if you’re focused on weight reduction and happy to forgo some tunability.

PRICE 480$


Popular posts from this blog

KONA SHRED

With a reputation for no-nonsense ruggedness and a background in the always progressive and punishing riding of Canada, Kona have been building hardcore hardtails for longer than almost anyone else. The Shred is the most expensive bike on test but it’s a proper trail tank.

Nukeproof Vector AM Comp Cro-Mo saddle

The Vector AM is pretty race focused, with minimal padding. There’s a deep (if narrow) pressurerelief channel to keep the blood flowing where it’s meant to. Used with bib shorts, we found it pretty comfortable for shorter rides and suffered no pain or discomfort in the central region. On steep climbs the slightly downturned nose provides a reasonable forward perch, while the svelte profile and smooth edges make it particularly unobtrusive when moving about on the descents. It’s quite stiff though, and can feel harsh on long rides or bumpy ground. We definitely wouldn’t want to spend much time on it without a chamois. It’s heavier than we’d expect for such a lightly padded perch too. There’s a lighter Pro version with titanium rails for $105, but at 241g it’s only 10g lighter. Weight 251g Price $67

GT Zaskar Evolution

While some bike models last just a couple of years, others change with the times to stay at the top of riders’ wishlists. In the second part of this series looking at the evolution of bikes that enjoy enduring popularity with UK riders, we turn to the GT Zaskar – a bike that was at the forefront of our sport for a long time and still has plenty of appeal today.

Cannondale Trail SL 29 SS

The fat aluminium tubes are a constrast to the skinny items seen elsewhere in the test, but this rigid Cannondale uses them to create one of the most old-school - and lightest - rides here.

Merida Big Seven 100

We've rolled up to our local woods, with a meandering blue trail, some natural wooded tracks and a bit of fire road chucked into the mix to see how the Big Seven 100 tackles trails that entry-level riders are likely to cut their teeth on.